Main menu


Jane Austen Mock History Book

“By a partial, prejudiced and ignorant historian.” Who but Jane Austen could have started a book with such a cheeky line? England history With these words, she’ll be funny from there. “This history is hardly dated,” she warns readers in her foreword. Those looking for more serious historical texts should look elsewhere. She wrote not to teach, but to express herself in her own satirical way.

Austin was only 15 when she wrote England history By 1791 she had already found a foothold as a writer and astute social commentator. In her adolescence, the possibility of publication was not yet her ultimate goal. It gave her a high degree of freedom for developmental experimentation with form, style, and subject matter. One of hers is an ironic history textbook that made fun of the general rigid approach and attitude towards narrating past events. According to Austin researcher Misty Kruger, “Many scholars perceive the history of Austin as a parody of that of Oliver Goldsmith in particular. The history of England from the early days to the death of George II (1771) and his summary of those volumes (1774). Reading the book as part of a strict self-study regime, Austin apparently let out a weary sigh, put the boring book down, and thought, “I can do better.”

Jane Austen, as usual, had no interest in boldly stating her opinion on the topic of her choice and presenting a romanticized version of someone or anything. England history It gives the reader a derisive tour through the tenure of the English monarch by a guide who is not at all shy about what she likes and what she finds offensive. It would be an insult to my readers if you think you are not familiar with the details of the Giving just a few sketches saves them the task of rereading what they’ve read before and writing what I don’t quite remember.”

Young Austen took a special interest in the maligned Stuart dynasty. Her work reflects the spirit of a rebellious young crusader seeking outdated justice for the cause. History has been violent and partisan for Stuart. Austen has rebuilt their tarnished reputation with her writing without sacrificing her own sense of humor in the process.

“Austin offers the reader a polyvalent, multimodal text that contains parody and historical writing, but is engaged in the tradition of martyrdom and vindication, or defense,” Kruger said.

Austen’s serious efforts were most directed at the execution of Henry VIII’s daughter Elizabeth I and her cousin Mary, Queen of Scots. Austin points the finger at Elizabeth’s advisers for allowing Elizabeth to “bring in this affable woman.” [Mary] To an untimely, worthless, scandalous death. When Austin labeled herself “partial and prejudiced,” she meant it.

England history It was an artistic collaboration. Austin’s older sister Cassandra, an amateur watercolourist, was recruited to provide illustrations for the text. Cassandra, intelligent and talented in her own right, seemed to understand the nature of the assignment perfectly. Mary, Queen of Scots, is a perfect, innocent, fairy-tale princess with a doll-like, heart-shaped face. It’s easy to imagine Jane and Cassandra giggling about their smear campaign against the revered Elizabeth, who historically was the villain, not the heroine.

Jane Austen eventually pursued a career of writing fictional (and more three-dimensional) heroines, and her brief stint as a historian matched the scope of the work itself. Second. Austen realized in her later years that she was “prejudiced, prejudiced, and ignorant”, which prevented her from exploring the full potential of her literary abilities. Maybe.

Support JSTOR Daily! Join Patreon’s new membership program today.


JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers and students. JSTOR Daily readers have free access to the original research behind the articles on JSTOR.

Posted By: Michel Levy

ELH, Vol. 77, No.4 (Winter 2010), pages 1015-1040

Johns Hopkins University Press

Author: Misty Kruger

Eighteenth century, vol. 56, No. 2, Special Issue: Jane Austen and Her Contemporaries (Summer 2015), pp.243–259

University of Pennsylvania Press

Author: Jane Stabler

Nineteenth Century Studies, vol. 21 (2007), pp. 1–18

Pennsylvania State University Press

Author: Katrina Banks Whitley, Keira Kramer

Historical Journal, vol. 53, No. 4 (December 2010), pp. 827-848

Cambridge University Press

By: GR Bath

Historical Review of Scotland, vol. 39, No. 127, Part 1 (April 1960), pp. 35-42

Edinburgh University Press